THEORIES OF IGNORANCE (9 Books)

THEORIES OF IGNORANCE

https://www.amazon.es/dp/B0CTJ2MTM5?binding=kindle_edition&ref=dbs_dp_rwt_sb_pc_tkin

The books in this series represent the culmination of the author’s thoughts on ‘Being,’ ‘Ignorance,’ and ‘Difference’ from the perspectives of philosophy of science and sociology. The series comprises the following titles:

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

The Ultimate Piece of the Universe: The Metaphysical Limits of Physics In this publication, the author examines the domain of elementary particle philosophy, which pertains to the ultimate reality, by drawing upon the insights of renowned scientists engaged in the fields of quantum and relativistic physics, as well as astrophysics.

The Unthinkable Universe: The philosophical ignorance of Kant, Schopenhauer, Ortega, and Popper. Modernity has returned to Platonic and Socratic ideas that reality is not only what we perceive with our sensibility. The book documents this skeptical perspective throughout with the exposition of the philosophical systems of our time.

Theory of Ignorance (published in two volumes: Being and Ignorance and Consciousness and Ignorance) : A summary of the philosophical concepts related to ignorance and an analysis of the work of Frederick Ferrier on agnoiology.

Difference and Ignorance: The objective of this analysis is to examine the parallels between quantum physics and the philosophical tenets of Leibniz, Heidegger, Deleuze, and Derrida.

Ignoramus: The author attempts to categorize the extent of our philosophical and scientific ignorance by presenting a series of aphorisms and sentences that summarize the limits of our perceived knowledge and the gaps in our understanding of Being and consciousness.

SOCIOLOGY

Agnotology. Sociology of Ignorance, ignorance of Sociology: The study of ignorance. The term ‘agnotology’ (a combination of ‘agnosia,’ meaning ‘lack of knowledge,’ and ‘logos,’ meaning ‘reasoning,’ ‘speech,’ or ‘discourse’) refers to the study of socially produced ignorance. This ignorance can be driven by human motivations, values, objectives, and interests, and it can be the subject of study, classification, and systematization.

Ignorant modernity: The concept of ‘ignorant modernity’ posits that the ignorance of the archetype of homo ignorans, as proposed by the author, would grow at the same rate as socially stored knowledge. This growth would occur concurrently with the necessary and obligatory trust in the social structure and intelligent society.

Subjectology, what we ignore and what we know about the social subject (from Machiavelli to Habermas): The concept of the subject in political science and sociology is examined by the author, who relates the classical contractual theory of the conformation of political society as an implicit pact between individual subjects (Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau) and sociological theories (Comte, Durkheim, Gabriel Tarde, Marx, Weber, Talcott Parsons, Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu, Mead, Goffman) on social subjects.